Prediction of Jill Craybas vs Tatiana Panova Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Craybas vs T. Panova

Jill Craybas

USA

1

Win

Played

5

Win

Age

1.60m

Height

1.54m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$665.1K

Career Money

$51.6K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Tatiana Panova

RUS

1

Win

Played

5

Win

Age

1.60m

Height

1.54m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$665.1K

Career Money

$51.6K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Craybas 1 - 5 Panova

They have played 16 sets in total, with Jill Craybas winning 5 and Tatiana Panova winning 11. The last match between Tatiana Panova and Jill Craybas was at the Istanbul Cup - Istanbul, 16-05-2005, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tatiana Panova getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Craybas	1
Panova	5

Last 6 H2H Matches:

(R1) Istanbul Cup - Istanbul(05-16-05)

Stats

Tatiana Panova

Jill Craybas

(R1) Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo(02-02-05)

Stats

Jill Craybas

Tatiana Panova

(R1) Sarasota Open - Sarasota, Florida(04-01-02)

Stats

Tatiana Panova

Jill Craybas

J. Craybas vs T. Panova H2H Profile

J. Craybas	Stats	T. Panova
$665,086	Career Prize Money	$51,600
46.08% (347-406)	Career Total W/L	50.64% (277-270)
0	Clay	3
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	1
3	Titles	5
1	Total H2H Matches	5
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Craybas vs T. Panova Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jill Craybas has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tatiana Panova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jill Craybas, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tatiana Panova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jill Craybas has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tatiana Panova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jill Craybas has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tatiana Panova winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jill Craybas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 51/44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/37). Tatiana Panova has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 112/126).
Player level: In the last year, Jill Craybas has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tatiana Panova has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Jill Craybas winning 1 times and Tatiana Panova being victorious 5 times. They have played 16 sets in total, with Jill Craybas winning 5 and Tatiana Panova winning 11.
The last match between Jill Craybas and Tatiana Panova was at the Istanbul Cup - Istanbul, 16-05-2005, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tatiana Panova getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Jill Craybas and Tatiana Panova have played a deciding set 4 times, with Jill Craybas winning 1 times and Tatiana Panova 3 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jill Craybas has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tatiana Panova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jill Craybas has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tatiana Panova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jill Craybas has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tatiana Panova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jill Craybas vs Tatiana Panova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Craybas vs T. Panova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Craybas	Stats	T. Panova
1	H2H Matches Won	5
5	Sets Won	11
71	Games Won	89
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
17% (1/6)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	83% (5/6)
25% (1/4)	Deciding Set Win %	75% (3/4)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (4/4)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/4)
0% (0/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Craybas Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Mercury Insurance Open - Carlsbad - 29-07-2013
Q1 Julia BoserupJ. Boserup	L	6-3 2-6 6-4	Stats
AEGON International - Eastbourne - 17-06-2013
Q1 Kristyna PliskovaK. Pliskova	L	6-7(3) 6-1 6-3	Stats
Nurnberger Versicherungscup - Nurnberg - 10-06-2013
Q2 Marina MelnikovaM. Melnikova	L	6-4 6-7(5) 6-2	Stats
Q1 Magda LinetteM. Linette	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
Marseille - 03-06-2013
Q2 Cecilia CostaC. Costa	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Panova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 28-08-2006
Q1 Maria-Fernanda AlvesM. Alves	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
JPMorgan Chase Open - Los Angeles - 07-08-2006
Q1 Ivana LisjakI. Lisjak	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Acura Classic - San Diego - 31-07-2006
Q1 Hana SromovaH. Sromova	L	4-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Bank of the West Classic - Stanford - 24-07-2006
Q1 Emma LaineE. Laine	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
College Park - 03-07-2006
R1 Eleanor PetersE. Peters	W	6-2 2-6 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Craybas vs T. Panova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Craybas	Stats	T. Panova
45.83% (341/403)	YTD Win/Loss	50.64% (277/270)
46.87% (816/925)	Sets Win/Loss	50.08% (640/638)
48.65% (7778/8209)	Games Win/Loss	49.57% (5751/5851)
46.95% (177/200)	Hard Win/Loss	47.06% (112/126)
43.15% (85/112)	Clay Win/Loss	46.56% (61/70)
51.35% (57/54)	Indoor Hard W/L	58.40% (73/52)
37.29% (22/37)	Grass Win/Loss	58.00% (29/21)
0.04	Aces Per Game	0
275	Aces Total	17
0.12	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
967	Total Double Faults	153
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
506.74	Average Opponent Rank	390.31
64% (15048/23422)	1st Serve %	61% (903/1473)
58% (8660/15048)	1st Serve Win %	56% (508/903)
45% (3761/8375)	2nd Serve Win %	40% (223/563)
46% (1313/2862)	Break Points Won % (Total)	50% (78/156)
45% (10398/23139)	Return Points Win %	44% (649/1476)
32.53% (27/56)	Slam W/L	44.93% (31/38)
47.66% (61/67)	Masters W/L	42.50% (34/46)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	77.78% (7/2)
45.96% (199/234)	Main Tour W/L	47.49% (123/136)
56.52% (52/40)	Challenger W/L	74.65% (53/18)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	66.67% (2/1)
46% (335/736)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (274/540)
100% (5/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
54% (84/155)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (50/101)
47% (116/249)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (99/187)
82% (337/277)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (268/214)
18% (337/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (268/53)
16% (407/65)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (279/62)